According to
the Provincial Court of Madrid, comes a statement of acquittal for accused
" by applying the principle of presumption of innocence " enshrined
in the Spanish Constitution , " the record does not proof enough about
deception invoked to describe the facts of fraud " .
As for the
accusation of an offense punishable insolvency , both are absolved that "
there is no evidence their participation " in fact. " No insolvency
occurs when favoring creditors did not constitute criminal conduct selection
priority for payment of debts , making a charge creditors in preference to
cars," he adds.
You also
understand that since it is not established or the crime of fraud , nor that of
falsity , nor the uprising , " Nor can this type of crime to miss the main
element consisting be responsible for any criminal act ."
According to
the Office of Madrid , Sanz requesting to six years in prison and two for his
wife , the wife of Lorenzo Sanz Mancebo was the sole director of the company
Refinsa SL, while her husband was Nuada society . SA , both of some land owners
in the suburb of San Fernando de Henares.
Sale of land
In June 2003
the two companies agreed to sell fifty percent of these lands , under the price
of nearly nine and a half million euros, the company NumAm SA
Given that
prices had rocketed upward and the contract was not a public deed , societies
and Nuada Refinsa also agreed with the trial José Antonio R. R., S. NumAm
largest shareholder A. processing and James S. S. sole director of NumAm S. A.
- both also have been acquitted - the new sale of the property , this time
after termination of the above, for a much higher price and do not fifty
percent of the land but one hundred percent .
They agreed
and , according to the prosecutor , sell all the land to the company Coperfil
worth € 52.5 million , almost three times the price of the sale initially
referred . The July 28, 2005 the sale was made , which was deeded publicly on
13 September of the same year.
Defendants
Jose Antonio R. R. and James S. S. hid the new agreement partners Numan S. A. ,
contrary to this operation to be aware that the land purchased by them should
remain in his possession by the increase in land prices .
In July 2005
S. Refinsa societies L. and Nuada S. A. wanted to return twice ten million
euros to Numan S. A. by the value of land for the sale canceled. And since
Numan S. A. refused to accept , Lorenzo Sanz and his wife decided to stay with
the ten million subscribers over the nearly 30 million Coferfil that had been
deposited in their societies.
"
Accused Maria Sanz and LD lack of any real property , property , property and /
or assets to meet the costs that the complainant Numan SA had paid for the land
, plus interest established by a court of First Instance of Madrid in respect
of compensation , for a total amount of just over 16 million euros , "said
the prosecutor.
Refinsa
Society was declared bankruptcy in June 2008 , disappearing its original asset
and charged € 40 million for the land .
According to
the prosecutor , " Nuada society hid its assets in foreign operations
without any basis and without any economic performance . Creditors have no way
to attach any good ."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.